Re: R-71 backers bring in signature petitions





Image

r71




Election officials have begun processing Referendum 71 petitions submitted by foes of a new
"everything but marriage" domestic partnership law. It seems likely that a full signature check will be required, rather than a speedier random-sample check.

The sponsors, Protect Marriage Washington, hope to force a public vote in November on Senate Bill 5688, which extends all of the rights and responsibilities now afforded to marriage couples to same-sex partners and opposite-sex couples where one or more partners is 62 or older. The couples need to be signed up with the state domestic partnership registry to qualify.

Sponsors on Saturday submitted what they estimated were 138,000 voter signatures. The Elections Division won't verify a gross turn-in number until later in the week after petitions are returned being microfilmed and digitized by the State Archives. It takes 120,577 valid signatures to get on the ballot, so sponsors have a pad of roughly 14 percent to cover any invalid signatures. That's well below the 18 percent historic average error rate for ballot measures, and some initiatives have had invalidation rates well into the 20s.

Elections official Shane Hamlin says, "We are reasonably confident they failed to submit enough signatures to rely on a random sampling method to verify the validity of the signatures. So we are preparing to conduct a full signature verification." The final decision will be made once the crews have a firm signature count.
The full-check takes several weeks, rather than the several-day task of random sampling.
(no html)

Secretary of State
Steve Hobbs

Image
Image of Secretary of State Steve Hobbs

Connect with Us

Search Our Corner

About this Blog

The Washington Office of the Secretary of State’s blog provides from-the-source information about important state news and public services.

This space acts as a bridge between the public and Secretary Steve Hobbs and his staff, and we invite you to contribute often to the conversation here.

Comments Disclaimer

The comments and opinions expressed by users of this blog are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of the Secretary of State’s Office or its employees. The agency screens all comments in accordance with the Secretary of State’s blog use policy, and only those that comply with that policy will be approved and posted. Outside comments will not be edited by the agency.