Guns & history of initiatives to the Legislature





Image

I-591-&-I-594-map






It appears that the two gun-related initiatives to the Legislature (I-591 and I-594) will be forwarded to the fall ballot. Both measures received legislative hearings and, as most observers predicted, no further action has been taken, meaning the initiatives’ fate appears to be up to the voters. Mail ballots go out in mid-October and are due back by Nov. 4.

It is pretty rare in our 100-year history of “direct democracy” for the Legislature to adopt initiatives to the Legislature, as they often involve very controversial issues, such as assisted suicide, abortion, charter schools, affirmative action, bottle bill, medical malpractice reform, and recreational marijuana. The most recent measures passed by the Legislature were 20 years ago, I-159 (firearm enhancement for sentencing) and I-164 (restricting land-use regulation). The presidential primary initiative, I-99, was adopted by lawmakers in 1989, as was the blanket primary back in 1934.

Here is the full list of initiatives certified to the Legislature since 1914 and what happened to them. The ones that were approved by the Legislature are labeled “enacted” and if they went to the ballot, they are labeled either rejected or approved.

One interesting sidenote is that it is possible for the Legislature to approve an alternative to an Initiative to the Legislature and then both are submitted to the voters for their choice, if either. This happened in 1970, when voters adopted the Legislature’s version of not one, but two, environmental initiatives, creating the Model Litter Control Act and passing the shoreline protection law.
(no html)

Secretary of State
Steve Hobbs

Image
Image of Secretary of State Steve Hobbs

Connect with Us

Search Our Corner

About this Blog

The Washington Office of the Secretary of State’s blog provides from-the-source information about important state news and public services.

This space acts as a bridge between the public and Secretary Steve Hobbs and his staff, and we invite you to contribute often to the conversation here.

Comments Disclaimer

The comments and opinions expressed by users of this blog are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of the Secretary of State’s Office or its employees. The agency screens all comments in accordance with the Secretary of State’s blog use policy, and only those that comply with that policy will be approved and posted. Outside comments will not be edited by the agency.