R-71 update: Hundreds of signatures move into "accepted" pile after recheck

Image
IMG_8303

As Dave Ammons mentioned in his blog post yesterday, the Referendum 71 signature checkers have been doing a “recent registration check” for signatures that had been rejected because they weren’t found in the copy of the state voter database used for checking signatures. Because the checkers have been working off the version of the database used to check the Initiative 1033 sigs earlier this summer, new voters who registered in July and signed a referendum petition sheet didn’t appear in the copy of the database . The “recent registration check” will help find registrations for those petition signers who registered to vote in July. The recent registration check started earlier this week. Thursday night at 10 p.m., the checkers had finished doing the recent registration check on the first 160 batches of petitions. In the first 3½ days of the check a total of 443 (or 12.7 percent) of the 3,501 signatures not found on the first check or by a master checker have been moved to the “accepted” category. Another two names were found to be duplicates, and three other names might be added to the “accepted” list if readable signature images can be provided by the county where the signer indicated he/she lives. The referendum’s rejection rate for these 160 volumes had been 10.44 percent before the recent registration check began. Now, with the 443 names being transferred to the “accepted” category, the rejection rate for the 160 batches is 9.27 percent.
(html)

Secretary of State
Steve Hobbs

Image
Image of Secretary of State Steve Hobbs

Connect with Us

Search Our Corner

About this Blog

The Washington Office of the Secretary of State’s blog provides from-the-source information about important state news and public services.

This space acts as a bridge between the public and Secretary Steve Hobbs and his staff, and we invite you to contribute often to the conversation here.

Comments Disclaimer

The comments and opinions expressed by users of this blog are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of the Secretary of State’s Office or its employees. The agency screens all comments in accordance with the Secretary of State’s blog use policy, and only those that comply with that policy will be approved and posted. Outside comments will not be edited by the agency.