Supreme Court allows I-1366 to stay on fall ballot

The state Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that Initiative 1366 can remain on this fall’s statewide ballot. The court said an opinion outlining the court’s reasoning would come later, but it wrote that the group suing to keep I-1366 off the ballot has “not made the clear showing necessary for injunctive relief.” Secretary of State Kim Wyman, the state’s chief elections officer, was sued by challengers who wanted her to pull the measure off the ballot. Wyman said no initiative has ever been removed from the ballot by the courts once the measure has been given a ballot title by the Attorney General, collected sufficient voter signatures and been certified by the Secretary to the ballot. Wyman said of Friday’s ruling:

“We applaud the Supreme Court’s decision that allows Initiative 1366 to remain on this fall’s statewide ballot. This decision is a win for Washington voters and our state’s initiative process. “We take no position on I-1366 or whether it is constitutional, but we are pleased that the court is not preventing a vote on it. I-1366 does not exceed the initiative powers of the people and the 339,000 voters who signed the petition to put it on the ballot. Other voters who support or oppose this initiative deserve to have their voices heard through their vote. “Our office supports the constitutional right of Washington citizens to propose and vote on initiatives. This form of ‘direct democracy’ has been a cherished right of voters here for over 100 years. Today’s ruling reaffirms that right.”
The court’s ruling: http://1.usa.gov/1EFbS1G
(html)

Secretary of State
Steve Hobbs

Image
Image of Secretary of State Steve Hobbs

Connect with Us

Search Our Corner

About this Blog

The Washington Office of the Secretary of State’s blog provides from-the-source information about important state news and public services.

This space acts as a bridge between the public and Secretary Steve Hobbs and his staff, and we invite you to contribute often to the conversation here.

Comments Disclaimer

The comments and opinions expressed by users of this blog are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of the Secretary of State’s Office or its employees. The agency screens all comments in accordance with the Secretary of State’s blog use policy, and only those that comply with that policy will be approved and posted. Outside comments will not be edited by the agency.